February 24, 2010
246 views
Gender Matters – CSW54: A place for change?
by Wendy Harcourt
When told about the Commission on the Status of Women some might think, so what? Surely this is just yet another big UN affair with little impact in the real world? So why, then, are thousands of women from around the world coming to New York during the first two weeks of March?
So many indeed that registration closed early and those who managed to register on time are being warned that there will be restricted entry both in the official UN event and in the NGO sessions that are held parallel outside the UN. Undeterred more events are being scheduled in New York and emails are whizzing around with invitations to impromptu sessions set up as the parallel of the parallel.
So why?
Very simply this event held around the Commission on the Status of Women is the one official opportunity on the UN calendar for women to participate in holding their governments accountable to the promises made now 15 years ago in Fourth World Conference on Women held in Beijing, September 1995. It is, if you like, a substitute for another World Conference on Women. Beijing remains the largest and most influential of all the World Conferences on Women. Nearly 180 government delegations and 2,500 nongovernmental organizations met to discuss a broad range of issues concerning women. Many women’s organisations see the Beijing Conference as a turning point in the world’s understanding of women’s human rights. And the official document agreed to the Platform of Action remains the standards to which governments are asked to meet their promises to the world’s women. With speakers such as Hillary Rodham Clinton, Julius Nyerere of Tanzania, Jane Fonda and many heads of UN and government ministers it was an event that has not been able to be repeated. And for many in an age of uncertainty, insecurity and crisis it seems strategically important to hold to those promises and not to open up the agreement process. So events such as this CSW are strategic for women advocates to keep pushing governments to meet the agreements of the Platform of Action.
But why come to New York to do so?
Surely it would be better to stay at home. This is perhaps one of the most vital differences of women’s movements than others that satellite around the UN. This is a learn space for intergenerational knowledge sharing. New York becomes a meeting point, a source of information sharing, and a place to strategize on the world today. These crucial activities will not be happening so much in the official panels and discussions but in the corridors in the parallel sessions, and in the parallel sessions to those. And what will be the topic of those discussions? It will not just be the 12 points of action, but as almost all over the world it will be what has the impact of the financial crisis, of the food crisis, of the environment crisis of the care crisis on women today. In some ways the world looks much bleaker than 15 years ago, but in others it is a world much more understandable, more known through communication and one where women are figuring much more prominently even though there are still only 9 incumbent heads of state.
At the top of the list is still the deep economic crisis related to systemic failure with entrenched gender inequalities and continued marginalisation of women in access to resources, jobs and leadership. Women are still the majority of the world’s poorest people, at the financial crisis and the deepening economic recession is impacting them most.
Last year the 53rd CSW looked at economic and political empowerment of women. It will be important in this 54th session to not lose sight of how important economic analysis from a gender perspective will be in order to face and overcome the crisis. Economic analysis has to become gendered, and in a no nonsense way, full of the political and social realities as much as the technical measurement of the ups and down of indexes. In sharing information in New York and in the myriad of reports, tweets, blogs, messages, reports, the CSW promises to be a place to understand how decisions happening at the global and state level are making profound differences to women struggling to make livelihoods meet at the ground level.
In short the sessions in their no doubt organizationally chaotic way will help those concerned about women’s rights, gender inequality and empowerment to go beyond the figures. These figures can mask the tough realities but also they miss the places for hope and change. We need both to face the grim situation we are in but also to look at the energy and resolution in overcoming what can appear impossibly hellish situations.
In the SID Forum coverage of the CSW we plan to look at the multi-faceted reality of the impact of economic crises on women. It is crucial to get this right. But even more importantly through investigating how women are seeing the crisis, embedded within their lives, their analysis, we also want to search out their strategies for change.
In this way the SID Forum will delve deeper into how the economic crisis could create opportunities for change that recognizes the complexities of women’s productive and reproductive lives and ways forward out of the crises. Beijing’s Platform for Action is an important document because it is built on many thousands of discussions around the world that brought out just such these complexities and the vision for change and then distilled them into a doable Platform of Action. Beijing still needs to become a reality, but also 15 years later, even more is needed with the current scenarios we are facing. It is these scenarios we plan to report during our discussions on the CSW in our continued search for change.
Photo credit: Katutaide
Written by: Wendy Harcourt
Filed Under: Gender, Gender Matters - CSW54, Opinions
Tags: CSW, economic crisis, United Nations, Women
Trackback URL: http://www.sidint.net/why-csw-matters/trackback/



Chloe Schwenke
March 11, 2010 at 21:20
Dear Dr. Harcourt,
I just finished reading “Gender matters – CSW54: Where did it all go wrong?” on the SID website. While very well written, it’s not an easy read! I’m very glad that the dialogue continues, that SID is facilitating this, and that the June issue of the Development Journal will be focused on this issue.
As both a development practitioner and a professor, I do a reasonable amount of work in the GAD world, and I certainly identify with many of the sentiments expressed by the people talking in “the belly of the beast” as portrayed in your piece. I have a particular perspective on GAD, however, being a transsexual woman. For transgender people (and particularly trans women), not only is there the patriarchy to contend with, but the largely unquestioned tyranny of the gender binary. These two hurdles have rather dire implications for gender variant people, particularly in developing countries.
I’m writing this simply to ask whether there might still be room in the June edition for a small piece on GAD from a transgender perspective. If not, perhaps you could keep this offer in mind for a future opportunity. I have done a reasonable amount of publishing and writing (see my website), and would welcome such an opportunity to raise awareness to the realities of trans people in the context of international development.
With best wishes,
Chloe
lin
February 26, 2010 at 10:12
I will see you there!
Wendy
February 26, 2010 at 10:24
Great Lin, and everyone who is reading the blog and engaged in the CSW, please do contact me by email if you are in NYC for the CSW and watch this space for my comments, feel free to enter the debate!